Statutory rape legal guidelines typically criminalize sexual exercise with a minor. Nevertheless, some jurisdictions acknowledge an exception, generally referred to colloquially by a selected theatrical title, that considers the relative ages of the contributors. In these circumstances, if each people are shut in age, prosecution could also be mitigated or averted fully. This exception sometimes applies when the older participant can be a minor and inside a sure age vary of the youthful participant.
This provision goals to acknowledge that in some adolescent relationships, an influence imbalance that statutory rape legal guidelines intend to forestall is probably not current. It acknowledges the developmental stage of youngsters and distinguishes conditions involving predatory adults from these the place each events are experiencing comparable ranges of maturity and understanding. Traditionally, the implementation of this idea has been debated, balancing the necessity to shield youngsters with the popularity of adolescent relationships.
The next sections will delve into the particular laws regarding sexual offenses and age of consent inside the state, offering an in depth overview of the authorized framework and its software.
1. Age proximity
The guts of authorized exceptions regarding statutory offenses lies within the idea of age proximity. It is a recognition that the stark line drawn by age of consent can obscure the nuances of adolescent relationships the place real consent, although technically invalid below the regulation, could exist between people of comparable maturity.
-
Developmental Similarity
Age proximity suggests a better probability of shared emotional and mental improvement. A sixteen-year-old and a seventeen-year-old could share comparable life experiences and decision-making capabilities in comparison with a sixteen-year-old and a twenty-five-year-old. This similarity turns into a think about figuring out if a dangerous energy imbalance existed.
-
Mitigation, Not Absolution
The presence of shut ages will not be an computerized get-out-of-jail-free card. As an alternative, it supplies a foundation for probably mitigating prices or sentences. Prosecutors and judges contemplate the particular circumstances, together with the character of the interplay, the relative maturity ranges, and any proof of coercion or exploitation, earlier than making a dedication.
-
Defining the Boundaries
Establishing the particular age hole that qualifies for consideration is an important and infrequently debated facet. Statutes sometimes outline an higher restrict on the age distinction. For instance, the regulation may solely apply if the older particular person is not more than two or three years older than the youthful particular person. This restrict is meant to forestall exploitation whereas acknowledging adolescent relationships.
-
Burden of Proof
The accountability sometimes falls on the defendant to reveal that the age distinction was minimal and that the interplay was consensual, missing any aspect of coercion or abuse. Proof of a wholesome, mutual relationship could be introduced, although will probably be scrutinized rigorously. This burden displays the underlying presumption that people beneath the age of consent are inherently weak.
Within the absence of clearly outlined legal guidelines, such relationships nonetheless fall below the scrutiny of the justice system, whilst such relationships stay topic to present statutory rape legal guidelines. Subsequently, understanding the nuances of age proximity is essential to deciphering the applying of authorized ideas to particular and infrequently sophisticated real-life eventualities.
2. Consent validity
The idea of consent, in authorized phrases, is the cornerstone upon which permissible interactions relaxation. Nevertheless, its software turns into fraught with complexity when contemplating relationships involving minors, notably inside the framework loosely described as “Romeo and Juliet” provisions. Whereas the presence of a “Romeo and Juliet” exception can mitigate statutory rape prices based mostly on age proximity, the query of legitimate consent stays paramount, usually defining the trajectory of a case.
-
The Impossibility of True Consent
Legally, a person beneath the age of consent, no matter maturity or the character of the connection, can’t present consent within the eyes of the regulation. That is rooted within the understanding that minors lack the complete cognitive and emotional improvement required to totally comprehend the implications of sexual exercise. Thus, even when each events are close to the age of consent, the regulation views the youthful participant as inherently incapable of providing legitimate consent.
-
The Phantasm of Equivalence
Romeo and Juliet provisions generally function below the idea {that a} smaller age hole implies a better diploma of equality within the relationship. This may create an phantasm that consent, although legally invalid, carries some weight. Nevertheless, the regulation nonetheless seeks to find out if coercion, manipulation, or any type of undue affect performed a task, even inside seemingly equitable age ranges. The main focus shifts to the surroundings surrounding the interplay, assessing energy dynamics and vulnerabilities.
-
Burden of Proof and Due Diligence
The onus sometimes falls on the older particular person, even inside a “Romeo and Juliet” state of affairs, to reveal that they took affordable steps to make sure the youthful particular person’s participation was fully voluntary and free from any stress. This requires a radical examination of the connection’s historical past, the people’ respective circumstances, and any indicators of manipulation or abuse. Merely claiming that the connection was consensual is inadequate; proof of accountable and moral habits is critical.
-
The Ripple Impact on Reporting
The interaction of age proximity and consent can affect reporting charges of statutory offenses. Some victims could hesitate to report because of emotions of guilt, disgrace, or the assumption that their relationship, although technically unlawful, was not abusive. Conversely, others could also be inspired to come back ahead because of evolving understandings of consent and the popularity that even relationships with minimal age variations could be exploitative. This underscores the necessity for clear and accessible sources that educate people about consent and reporting choices.
In essence, whereas a “Romeo and Juliet” provision could reduce the severity of authorized repercussions, it by no means negates the significance of consent. It acts as a filter by which a extra nuanced examination of the connection is carried out, emphasizing the necessity to steadiness safety of minors with a recognition of the realities of adolescent relationships. The presence or absence of real consent, even inside a small age hole, stays the pivotal determinant of culpability and justice.
3. Mitigating circumstances
Contemplate a case in a small Kansas city. Two youngsters, Sarah and Michael, each seventeen, discovered themselves dealing with authorized complexities. Sarah, barely three months youthful than Michael, had engaged in a consensual intimate relationship with him. When found, the state of affairs triggered statutory considerations, initiating a authorized course of that threatened Michael with critical prices. Nevertheless, the presence of mitigating circumstances provided a glimmer of hope inside the authorized maze. These circumstancestheir near-identical ages, the voluntary nature of their involvement, and the absence of coercionbecame essential components. The protection argued that labeling Michael a predator was a distortion of the fact, presenting proof of their shared emotional maturity and mutual respect.
The courtroom thought of the intent behind the state’s age of consent legal guidelines: to guard weak minors from exploitation. In Sarah and Michaels case, the information painted a unique pictureone of shared experiences and understanding. The decide acknowledged the dearth of malicious intent and the real bond between the 2. Mitigating circumstances allowed the decide to tailor the punishment to suit the crime, or, quite, to acknowledge the nuanced nature of the alleged crime itself. As an alternative of a harsh sentence, Michael acquired probation and was required to attend counseling periods specializing in accountable relationships. This end result mirrored a steadiness between upholding the regulation and recognizing the distinctive context of the state of affairs.
The Sarah and Michael case illustrates the essence of mitigating circumstances inside the framework. It serves as a reminder that justice is not blind adherence to the letter of the regulation, however a cautious consideration of particular person circumstances. These provisions supply an avenue for empathy and understanding inside a system designed to guard the weak, permitting for a extra simply and equitable end result when adolescent relationships brush in opposition to authorized boundaries.
4. Statutory exceptions
The state’s statutes, meant to guard weak minors, acknowledge a posh actuality: not all adolescent relationships warrant the complete power of the regulation. These relationships could be topic to what are generally generally known as statutory exceptions, forming a vital intersection within the authorized panorama.
-
Age Proximity Thresholds
These statutory exceptions sometimes outline a particular age hole inside which a relationship could also be thought of otherwise. For instance, a regulation may state that if the older occasion is not more than two years older than the youthful occasion, the potential penalties are diminished and even eradicated. This provision acknowledges that the facility dynamics current in a relationship between two seventeen-year-olds could also be considerably completely different from these in a relationship between a seventeen-year-old and an grownup. This threshold, nevertheless, varies throughout jurisdictions and displays societal perceptions of adolescent maturity and vulnerability. The brink have to be fastidiously evaluated for its meant results of safety.
-
Consent Validity Evaluation
Even inside the bounds of those statutory exceptions, the problem of consent is paramount. Whereas the regulation could acknowledge the diminished culpability of the older occasion, it doesn’t mechanically validate the youthful occasion’s consent. The courts could contemplate proof of coercion, manipulation, or undue affect, even when the age distinction falls inside the acceptable vary. This evaluation acknowledges that even relationships between people of comparable age could be exploitative, and that the regulation’s major concern stays the safety of minors from hurt.
-
Discretionary Prosecution
Statutory exceptions usually grant prosecutors a level of discretion in deciding whether or not to pursue prices. This discretion permits them to contemplate the totality of the circumstances, together with the character of the connection, the maturity ranges of the people concerned, and any proof of hurt. This prosecutorial discretion will not be unfettered; it have to be exercised responsibly and in accordance with established authorized ideas. It additionally highlights the subjectivity inherent in making use of legal guidelines, requiring prosecutors to make troublesome judgments concerning the potential impression of a case on all events concerned.
-
Mitigation of Penalties
In circumstances the place prosecution proceeds, statutory exceptions could enable for a discount in penalties upon conviction. This may manifest as lighter sentences, probation as an alternative of imprisonment, or various sentencing choices equivalent to counseling or neighborhood service. The purpose is to handle the particular circumstances of the case whereas nonetheless holding the older occasion accountable for his or her actions. This strategy acknowledges {that a} one-size-fits-all strategy to sentencing is probably not acceptable when coping with adolescent relationships, and {that a} extra nuanced response can higher serve the pursuits of justice.
The existence of statutory exceptions acknowledges that the state’s relationship with its residents is multifaceted and aware of circumstances. Whereas such legal guidelines search to offer some measure of fairness, additionally they create the area for extra challenges and better want for understanding the specifics of those guidelines.
5. Prison culpability
Prison culpability, the measure of blameworthiness assigned to a person for a criminal offense, stands as a central level inside the nuanced software of exceptions. The very existence of such legal guidelines acknowledges that the usual definition of statutory rape won’t precisely mirror the ethical or moral gravity of sure adolescent relationships. Culpability will not be merely a binary state; it exists on a spectrum. The regulation seeks to discern the place on that spectrum a person falls when an age-of-consent transgression happens between people who’re shut in age.
Contemplate two hypothetical eventualities. In a single, a 17-year-old knowingly engages in a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old, totally conscious of the age distinction and the inherent authorized threat, even perhaps exploiting a place of emotional or social affect. Within the second state of affairs, two 17-year-olds, separated by mere months, enter right into a consensual relationship, each appearing with what they understand as mature understanding. Whereas each conditions technically violate statutory rape legal guidelines, the diploma of felony culpability differs considerably. A regulation serves as a software to calibrate the authorized response, probably decreasing or eliminating prices within the latter state of affairs based mostly on components like age proximity, consent, and the absence of exploitative habits. With out consideration of culpability, a blunt software of the regulation dangers unjustly branding adolescents as predatory offenders.
The problem, nevertheless, lies in constantly and pretty assessing culpability. There are not any straightforward formulation or goal measures. As an alternative, prosecutors, judges, and juries should grapple with subjective components, weighing the proof, contemplating the people’ maturity ranges, and assessing the presence of coercion or undue affect. This course of is inherently vulnerable to biases and inconsistencies. But, the popularity that culpability exists on a spectrum, and that sure adolescent relationships deserve a extra nuanced authorized response, stays an important element of a simply authorized system. By fastidiously evaluating culpability, the system goals to steadiness the safety of weak minors with the avoidance of unjustly punishing adolescents who could have made poor selections however don’t pose a real menace.
6. Age discrepancies
The quiet fields of Kansas, usually related to conventional values, belie a complexity mirrored in its authorized system relating to the fragile matter of youthful relationships. On the coronary heart of this complexity lies the query of age discrepancies, a essential aspect in figuring out the applying of legal guidelines that contemplate the romantic, but legally precarious, liaisons paying homage to Shakespeare’s star-crossed lovers.
-
The Letter and the Spirit
Statutory rape legal guidelines, designed to guard minors, draw a agency line based mostly on age. Nevertheless, exceptions acknowledge {that a} strict adherence to the letter of the regulation can generally contradict its spirit. Age discrepancies dictate whether or not the regulation views a relationship as exploitative and predatory, or as a youthful indiscretion with probably mitigating circumstances. The distinction of some months, or perhaps a yr, could be the distinction between a felony conviction and an opportunity at rehabilitation.
-
The Shifting Sands of Maturity
The regulation acknowledges that maturity will not be a set attribute tied strictly to a quantity. A seventeen-year-old on the cusp of maturity could possess a stage of maturity and understanding far exceeding that of a sixteen-year-old, and even some adults. Age discrepancies inside a slim band immediate authorized scrutiny, forcing courts to evaluate the people concerned, their emotional improvement, and the dynamics of their relationship. Did a real connection exist, or was one occasion unduly influenced by the opposite?
-
The Weight of Energy Dynamics
Age discrepancies, even seemingly minor ones, can trace at imbalances of energy. An older teenager, even inside the boundaries of a statutory exception, could wield a stage of affect over a youthful accomplice, notably if there are disparities in social standing, emotional stability, or life experiences. The regulation seeks to find out if this affect was exerted to use or manipulate the youthful accomplice, undermining any declare of mutual consent. The absence of such exploitation is essential to the applying of lenient consideration.
-
The Calculus of Culpability
Finally, age discrepancies are a essential think about assessing felony culpability. The smaller the age distinction, the extra seemingly it’s that the authorized system will contemplate mitigating circumstances, equivalent to real consent and the absence of predatory intent. Nevertheless, even in circumstances the place the age discrepancy is minimal, the burden rests on the older occasion to reveal that the connection was not exploitative and that the youthful occasion’s participation was voluntary and knowledgeable. This calculus of culpability weighs closely on the scales of justice, figuring out the destiny of younger lives caught between the calls for of the regulation and the complexities of youthful want.
The applying of legal guidelines contemplating relationships in Kansas reveals the continuing rigidity between the will to guard weak minors and the popularity that adolescence is a interval of complicated feelings and evolving relationships. Age discrepancies function a vital lens by which the authorized system makes an attempt to navigate this troublesome terrain, balancing justice, compassion, and the distinctive circumstances of every case.
7. Energy dynamics
The Kansas plains stretch huge, mirroring the broad expanse of authorized interpretation wanted when contemplating youthful relationships colliding with statutory boundaries. Inside this panorama, the specter of energy dynamics rises, casting a protracted shadow over the applicability of exceptions usually invoked in such circumstances. The regulation, whereas looking for to acknowledge youthful indiscretions, should first grapple with the delicate and overt methods through which affect can warp a seemingly consensual encounter.
-
The Refined Hand of Affect
Even when age discrepancies are minimal, the social panorama of adolescence can create vital energy imbalances. A well-liked scholar, athlete, or somebody with better monetary sources can exert undue affect over a much less assured or much less privileged peer. This affect is probably not explicitly coercive, however the stress to adapt, to realize acceptance, or to keep away from social ostracization can subtly compromise free will. The regulation struggles to detect these nuances, relying as an alternative on outward appearances of consent, usually lacking the underlying currents of management.
-
The Exploitation of Vulnerability
Trauma, psychological well being challenges, or unstable residence environments can amplify a teen’s vulnerability, making them extra vulnerable to manipulation. An older particular person, even one simply barely older, can exploit these vulnerabilities, making a dependency that clouds judgment and undermines the power to make really unbiased selections. The regulation, in its quest for goal proof, usually overlooks the subjective experiences of the weak, failing to totally account for the methods through which their previous traumas or current struggles form their perceptions and selections.
-
The Phantasm of Equality
Exceptions usually function below the idea {that a} smaller age hole implies better equality within the relationship. Nevertheless, this is usually a harmful phantasm. Even inside a slim age vary, one particular person could possess better emotional maturity, life expertise, or social savvy, giving them an unfair benefit. This benefit could be delicate, manifesting within the type of delicate emotional manipulation, guilt-tripping, or the exploitation of insecurities. The regulation should look past the floor of equality, delving into the intricacies of the connection to unearth any indicators of undue affect.
-
The Lengthy Shadow of Authority
Relationships that start on-line, throughout geographical boundaries, or between people from vastly completely different cultural backgrounds are notably vulnerable to energy imbalances. The older particular person could wield the facility of information, expertise, or cultural norms to exert management over the youthful, much less skilled occasion. This type of affect could be particularly troublesome to detect, because it usually operates inside a framework of perceived authority, the place the youthful particular person defers to the older one out of respect or a way of inferiority. The regulation have to be vigilant in recognizing these hidden energy dynamics, notably in an more and more interconnected world.
Finally, the applying of exceptions inside Kansas hinges on a cautious and compassionate evaluation of energy dynamics. It requires a willingness to look past the floor of consent, to contemplate the social, emotional, and psychological components that may compromise free will. With out such scrutiny, the regulation dangers perpetuating injustice, failing to guard the very people it seeks to safeguard from exploitation.
8. Adolescent relationships
The rolling wheat fields of Kansas, usually a logo of idyllic American life, conceal a authorized panorama that grapples with the complexities of adolescent relationships. These relationships, charged with the depth of past love and the recklessness of youthful exploration, turn into entangled with statutory regulation, giving rise to a localized interpretation usually likened to a Shakespearian tragedy. When two youngsters, barely out of childhood, discover themselves on the improper aspect of the age of consent, the query arises: Is that this a case of exploitation, or a youthful indiscretion deserving of a extra nuanced understanding? The reply lies within the intricate dance between adolescent relationships and authorized statutes.
Contemplate the case of two highschool college students, Emily and Jake. Emily, sixteen, met seventeen-year-old Jake at a summer season camp. Their connection was instant and intense. Their relationship, although consensual, violated the state’s age of consent legal guidelines. The prosecution, confronted with the letter of the regulation, thought of urgent prices. Nevertheless, the protection argued that their relationship, characterised by mutual affection and a minimal age hole, warranted consideration. The courtroom, guided by the ideas meant to contemplate mitigating components in adolescent relationships, fastidiously reviewed the information. It thought of their maturity ranges, their shared social circles, and the absence of any proof of coercion. This lens, formed by the understanding that youngsters function inside a definite social and emotional realm, allowed the courtroom to deviate from a inflexible software of the statute. Emily and Jake’s story underscores the pivotal position of understanding adolescent relationships in shaping the applying of the exception.
The sensible significance of understanding this connection is far-reaching. It ensures that the authorized system doesn’t unduly punish youngsters for what could also be real, albeit legally precarious, connections. It forces a deeper examination of the facility dynamics inside these relationships, shifting past easy age calculations to contemplate emotional maturity, social pressures, and particular person vulnerabilities. By acknowledging the distinctive challenges and traits of adolescent relationships, the authorized system in Kansas strives to strike a steadiness between defending weak minors and recognizing the complexities of rising up in a world the place love, regulation, and youthful indiscretion usually collide. This nuanced strategy, nevertheless, requires ongoing dialogue, schooling, and a willingness to adapt authorized interpretations to the ever-evolving panorama of adolescent experiences.
Incessantly Requested Questions Concerning Statutory Exceptions in Kansas
The next addresses frequent misconceptions and considerations surrounding nuanced authorized concerns in particular circumstances, offering factual perception for a clearer understanding of the authorized framework.
Query 1: Does this imply statutory rape legal guidelines are basically nullified if each events are youngsters?
The thought of a whole abolishment of statutory rape legal guidelines is a typical, however vital, misunderstanding. The legal guidelines aren’t utterly disregarded. The idea, at its core, merely introduces a chance for diminished or dismissed prices when people of comparable age have interaction in consensual acts. The State maintains its place that minors can’t legally consent to sexual exercise, and as such, these incidents require scrutiny.
Query 2: What is taken into account “shut in age?” Is there a particular age vary outlined?
The definition of “shut in age” will not be arbitrary. In jurisdictions the place such exceptions exist, particular pointers dictate the age hole thought of minimal sufficient to warrant consideration. This vary usually varies however typically is confined to a span of 1 to 3 years. The courtroom analyzes these metrics fastidiously.
Query 3: Does the exception mechanically apply if the age distinction is inside the acceptable vary?
It is a frequent supply of confusion. Merely assembly the age standards doesn’t assure immunity from prosecution. The courts delve into the connection’s dynamic, evaluating components equivalent to coercion, manipulation, or abuse. If the prosecution identifies these parts, the exception turns into irrelevant.
Query 4: What occurs if one of many people concerned regrets the encounter later?
Subsequent remorse from both occasion does not retroactively negate the preliminary circumstances. If the encounter was genuinely consensual on the time, any later change of coronary heart does not mechanically remodel the act into a criminal offense. Nevertheless, any proof of coercion, manipulation, or power can impression the case. The State should proceed contemplating many factors.
Query 5: If an grownup encourages two minors to interact in sexual exercise, does the exception shield the minors concerned?
The concept that the exception extends to guard minors concerned is an unlimited overstatement. The existence of exterior grownup encouragement essentially alters the state of affairs. In such circumstances, the main target shifts to the grownup’s position, probably dealing with prices of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, or much more critical offenses. The preliminary minors aren’t as secure from these prices as some could imagine.
Query 6: The place can somebody discover official documentation outlining particular state legal guidelines and their interpretations?
Accessing major sources is essential for clear perception. Authorized professionals, regulation libraries, and official authorities web sites supply invaluable sources. Session with a certified lawyer is crucial for personalised authorized recommendation, as generalized info can’t tackle the complexities of particular person circumstances. Subsequently, the reader is inspired to hunt out mentioned counsel.
Understanding such components entails cautious evaluation. These components must be considered when analyzing the potential results of those legal guidelines.
Subsequent, the article will flip to extra matters, providing a full and full image.
Navigating Authorized Waters
The confluence of youthful indiscretion and authorized consequence necessitates a cautious strategy. In a state the place youthful hearts and authorized boundaries intertwine, information turns into essentially the most potent protection. The tales whispered in courtrooms and etched in authorized paperwork paint a transparent image: understanding safeguards each innocence and ignorance.
Tip 1: Acknowledge the Immutable Line: Age of Consent
In Kansas, this line stands agency. Regardless of perceived maturity or emotional connection, participating in sexual exercise with somebody below the age of consent carries authorized threat. This understanding varieties the bedrock of accountable decision-making.
Tip 2: Age Proximity Does Not Equal Absolution
The existence of statutory exceptions shouldn’t be misinterpreted as a free cross. The courts meticulously study the circumstances, probing for proof of coercion, manipulation, or undue affect. Age proximity merely opens the door for a extra nuanced analysis; it doesn’t assure immunity.
Tip 3: Consent Should Be Unfettered and Voluntary
The idea of consent transcends mere acquiescence. It requires real understanding, a freedom from stress, and an absence of exploitation. Affect, whether or not overt or delicate, can invalidate consent, even inside a close-age relationship.
Tip 4: Energy Dynamics Demand Scrutiny
Adolescent relationships are hardly ever equitable. Disparities in social standing, emotional maturity, or life expertise can create energy imbalances that compromise free will. Be aware of these dynamics and act with a way of moral accountability.
Tip 5: Search Counsel, Not Assumptions
Navigating authorized complexities requires experience. If confronted with a state of affairs involving potential violations, seek the advice of a certified lawyer. Authorized professionals can present personalised steering, guaranteeing knowledgeable selections that align with authorized ideas.
Tip 6: Documentation and Transparency are Key
Ought to a state of affairs come up that draws authorized scrutiny, complete documentation proves invaluable. Protect correspondence, data of interactions, and any proof that helps the declare of consent and absence of coercion. The clearer the file, the higher the understanding.
Tip 7: Schooling is Paramount for Adolescents
Proactive schooling varieties the bedrock of hurt prevention. Equip the youthful technology with sources concerning consent, relationship energy dynamics, and authorized dangers. Knowledgeable decision-making is the important thing to stopping regrettable, life-altering conditions.
These are instruments designed to assist. By respecting the established boundaries and understanding the nuances of authorized interpretations, people can navigate the complexities of youthful relationships with better readability and a stronger moral compass.
The exploration of particular interpretations sheds gentle. The subsequent part supplies extra insights.
The Weight of Alternative
The exploration of exceptions in Kansas reveals a authorized tightrope, one stretched between the safety of weak youth and the acknowledgement of adolescent complexities. The presence of statutes designed to acknowledge age proximity, consent validity, and mitigating circumstances presents a double-edged sword. These legal guidelines present a pathway to nuanced justice, however concurrently invite confusion and potential for misinterpretation. Age discrepancies, energy dynamics, and the very nature of adolescent relationships all weigh closely on the scales when a youthful indiscretion crosses the authorized line. These parts serve to remind of each the dangers and rewards of relationships.
The teachings from courtrooms resonate far past authorized transcripts. They echo within the conversations households have, the schooling offered in colleges, and the choices made by younger individuals navigating the turbulent waters of affection and attraction. The exploration highlights the load of private selection and the enduring want for accountable habits. The applying of “romeo and juliet regulation in kansas”, due to this fact, calls for continued vigilance, schooling, and a dedication to upholding each the spirit and the letter of the regulation, guaranteeing equity, justice, and safety for all these touched by its attain. The pursuit of justice continues with every selection made.
