The referenced time period seems to conflate probably disparate ideas. The phrase suggests a determine, the “bagman,” concerned in illicit or questionable monetary transactions. This determine is then juxtaposed with “legislation and order,” a phrase usually related to strict adherence to authorized frameworks and the upkeep of social stability by legislation enforcement. The juxtaposition implies a contradiction or irony, the place somebody seemingly flouting the legislation is described as supporting or benefiting from a system of legislation and order. For instance, one would possibly describe a corrupt official who earnings from unlawful actions whereas publicly advocating for stricter legislation enforcement as an example of this perceived contradiction.
The importance of such a characterization lies in its potential to erode public belief in establishments and the rule of legislation. When people perceived as undermining the authorized system are concurrently seen as benefiting from it, it may well foster cynicism and a perception that the system is inherently unfair or corrupt. Traditionally, cases of corruption and perceived hypocrisy inside legislation enforcement and authorities have led to social unrest, requires reform, and a decline in citizen engagement. The advantages, if any, are restricted to these instantly concerned within the illicit actions, whereas the broader societal prices could be substantial.
